Norvegia – Servicii de inginerie – Consultancy services for construction and property - Consultant engineer for fire - independent inspection (UK RIBr)

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) Emphasis is put on the fact that this competition gelder UK RIBr. Attention is agreed to Innlandet county parallel to having a competition ongoing for the consulting engineer for fire - consultancy and engineering design (RIBr). Tenderers can submit tenders in both competitions if they so desire, but attention is defined that the tenderer awarded the contract for RIBr cannot be awarded a contract for UK RIBr. If the same tenderer is ranked best in both competitions, the tenderer will rank second in the competition for UK RIBr and the contract will be awarded for UK RIBr. The objective of the procurement is to enter into a framework agreement for consultancy services for buildings and property for the discipline; consultant engineer for fire - independent inspections (UK RIBr). This ensures that the county has sufficient capacity and good competence for the execution of small and large projects. The framework agreement shall apply for all of Innlandet County and the assignments will be spread throughout Innlandet County. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? Hedmarken og Østerdal tingrett Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons. Will the purely national rejection reasons, as stated in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents, apply? Procurement Regulations Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). Consultancy services for construction and property - Consultant engineer for fire - independent inspection (UK RIBr) Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. INNLANDET FYLKESKOMMUNE Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. 01 713[telefon eliminat]e3f35c4-2e4c-46b8-bb71-ed39e72ed21a b673375b-ff49-43e7-9b15-87d70fc12208 exg-crim-part none exg-mis-prep-confl [email eliminat] required exg-mis-distortion 71313200 exg-sitn-other cn-standard ORG-[telefon eliminat] ORG-0002 gen-pub 155/2026 exg-natl-bre-nat-law exg-crim-traffick exg-sitn-as-susp 16 10:00:00+00:00 ••• ••• 80 exg-sitn-bankr exg-crim-terror epo-notice ra no-eu-funds 2026-08-24+00:00 HAMAR 2317 NOR 32014L0024 exg-pmt-bre-tax 71530000 exg-mis-bre-soc-law 3 71312000 true exg-crim-fraud non-restricted-document ENG 920717152 no 926723669 Anskaffelsesforskriften eforms-sdk-1.13 exg-sitn-insolvency not-allowed exg-mis-misrepresent LOT-[telefon eliminat] exg-sitn-liq-admin 72224[telefon eliminat] update-add exg-mis-misconduct 71315[telefon eliminat] https://permalink.mercell.com/285618429.aspx exg-mis-bre-env-law epo-procurement-document NO020 exg-mis-partic-confl PROCEDURE 45343100 [telefon eliminat] c2c67852-2ac7-4da9-a9ce-5e5ddc343605-01 19:32:51+00:00 exg-pmt-bre-ssc false 71320000 services Thomas Øiestad exg-crim-laund exg-sitn-cred-arran 71315210 19:45:15+00:00 exg-mis-bre-lab-law 2026-08-13+02:00 ••• ••• 31+00:00 ••• ••• 82 Parkgata 64 2.3 2026-08-11+00:00 exg-crim-corrpt open http://www.innlandetfylke.no