Norvegia – Echipament informatic şi accesorii de birou, cu excepţia mobilierului şi a pachetelor software – Procurement - Workstations, 2026 (2)

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Open tender contest Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Renewal lenght is 12 months The contracting authority uses the exclusion provisions in PPR § 7-9 fourth paragraph, and has replaced the award criteria in accordance with the second link with climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specification. It is considered that this gives a clearly better climate and environmental effect, and this is justified below. The contracting authority has held a market dialogue. The market dialogue shows that a separate award criterion for climate and environment, connected to transport, logistics and general environmental descriptions, will, to a limited degree, provide real and verifiable differentiation between the tenders. The tenderers operate to a large degree within the same manufacturer and logistics, and the form of transport is largely affected by the contracting authority ́s concrete ordering and delivery needs. Such an award criteria will therefore mainly be able to provide competition for descriptions and reporting schemes, without ensuring a higher environmental level for the products that are actually delivered. The contracting authority has identified that the most relevant climate and environmental impacts in this procurement are related to the product lifecycle, including production/raw material use, energy efficiency in use, lifetime, repairability, spare parts access, packaging, collecting and handling model changes in the contract period. It is considered more efficient for this type of IT equipment to set binding and substantiated minimum requirements for the products and the implementation of the contract than to evaluate relative differences between the tenderer's descriptions. The contracting authority therefore assesses that the climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications clearly give better climate and environmental effect than weighting climate and environment as the award criterion. The requirements ensure that all the offered products and deliveries fulfil a fixed minimum level, regardless of which tenderer is awarded the contract. The contracting authority replaces climate and environment as the award criterion with climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 7-9 fourth section. The requirements concern, among other things, environmental certification or documented fulfilment of equivalent underlying environmental requirements, update support, repairability, spare parts access, packaging, summary verification, necessary product data for system follow-up and the requirement that replacement products/model changes in the contract period shall fulfil at least the same climate and environmental requirements as the original offered products. The requirements are assessed as proportional, relevant and connected to the contract object. They are designed as binding requirements that are documented by the tender submission and followed-up in the contract period. Quality Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Has the tenderer's business conduct been stopped? Is the tenderer in a similar situation in accordance with an equivalent procedure set in the national law? See the national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). In accordance with the regulations. Weighting: The award criteria is weighted 50%. Orientation: Tenderers shall fill in the requirement form for the sub-contracts a tender is submitted for. The requirement form shall be submitted as an annex to the tender in Excel format. Tenderers shall respond to the requirements in the requirement form and enclose documentation when requested. Where a tenderer refers to annexes or other documentation, it shall be clear which annex, which side, which point or part of the documentation supports the response. Tenderers shall not change requirement numbers, requirement text, requirement type, weighting, sheet structure, formulas or other parts of the requirement form that are not meant to be completed. Missing, unclear or inadequate responses can have an impact on the evaluation. If the relationship is for non fulfilment of the minimum requirement, this can lead to rejection Evaluation: The quality will be evaluated, after a procurement assessment, separately for each sub-contract, based on the tenderer ́s response to the requirement form and associated documentation. The requirement types, internal weighting and evaluation scale are in the tab "Beskrivelse" in the requirement form. Points will be given for each evaluation requirement on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 being the best. The points will be given after the evaluation scale in the requirement form. Other tenders will be awarded a relative point score based on the best offered system. The contracting authority will assess the qualities, solutions and documentation requirements that are in each requirement. Where a requirement sets a minimum level, the minimum level must be met. Fulfilment, better documented qualities, better suitability for the contracting authority ́s use or other relevant added value within the required requirement can give a higher score. Concrete, relevant and verifiable responses will be given higher than that for general descriptions, standard market material or undocumented claims. Unclear, incomplete or incomplete verifiable responses can result in a lower score. The Contracting Authority calculates Quality Score per role/product and weights them in accordance with the evaluation volumes in the price form. Examples of calculations: Role of The Evaluation Volume Share of Total Volume Quality Score Weighted Quality Score Role 1 1 000 45.05 % 8 3.60 Role 2 300 13.51 % 7 0.95 Role 3 300 13.51 % 6 0.81 Role 4 600 27.03 % 9 2.43 Role 5 20 0.90 % 10 0.09 Sum 2 220 100 % 7.88 Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? Ålesund kommune Procurement - Workstations, 2026 (2) Weighting: The award criteria is weighted 50%. Orientation: Tenderers shall fill in the attached price form for the sub-contracts that the tenderer submits a tender for and submit the price form as an annex to the tender in Excel format. Tenderers shall only fill in cells that are marked for filling in. Tenderers shall not change other cells, formulas, sheet structure or calculation models in the price form. If the tenderer changes formulas, deletes content, makes the price form difficult to check or compare, it can be assessed as a deviation from the tender documentation. Missing completion of price fields, or filling in, which makes it impossible or disproportionately demanding to calculate the evaluation price, can lead to the tender being rejected. All prices shall be stated in NOK excluding VAT and include all costs that shall be included in the evaluation price, including freight/delivery, order/invoice fee and procurement commission where relevant. Costs that the tenderer knows will apply, but which are not particularly priced, will be seen as included in the given prices. The requirements for cost prices, mark-up and documentation of cost prices are stated in point 7.2.11 and the price form. Evaluation: The price will be evaluated separately for each sub-contract. For each sub-contract, the field "Total Sum for evaluation" is used in the price form as a basis for an evaluation of the award criteria Price. The attached evaluation model, hybrid model with break point 1, will be used for evaluating the price. The tenderer ́s point score for the award criterion Price is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage. The aim of the procurement is to cover the need for computer equipment, in accordance with the requirement specifications. The contracting authority would like to enter into framework agreements within the following parts: Sub-contract 1 - Workstation, including laptop and desktop PCs, monitors and docking, including accessories (option). Sub-contract 2 - Clients, including thin clients and Chromebooks, including accessories (option). Tenders can be submitted for one or both lots. One (1) framework agreement shall be signed per sub-contract. Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. Anywhere within the participating municipalities (including municipal companies) Ålesund municipality Sykkylven municipality Sula municipality Haram Municipality Fjord municipality Stranda municipality Ørsta municipality Ulstein municipality Hareid Municipality Herøy municipality Sande municipality Volda Municipality Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Price Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Environment The competition documents are updated as a result of the received questions from the tenderers. The tender deadline is extended from 20.08.2026, 12:00 to 26.08.2026, 12:00. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Sunnmøre tingrett Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. 01 exg-mis-sanction allowed none exg-mis-prep-confl 120000000 required 110000000 exg-mis-distortion 2028-09-14Z exg-sitn-other supplies price 2026-09-14Z [telefon eliminat] https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=95538&GoTo=Tender Lenke til innkjøpsdokumentene 97 gen-pub 6001 155/2026 6003 exg-sitn-as-susp 16 anyw [telefon eliminat] quality 32014L0024 0 Stian Busæt per-exa 2 exg-mis-bre-soc-law 3[telefon eliminat] exg-crim-fraud non-restricted-document 30231300 30231100 eforms-sdk-1.13 body-pl-la exg-sitn-insolvency Postboks 1354 Sentrum 30213[telefon eliminat]+00:00 ••• ••• 00 exg-mis-partic-confl [email eliminat] [email eliminat] 2026-08-18+00:00 exg-mis-bre-lab-law 2026-08-13+02:00 2.3 33bb3973-4662-4739-8d22-51343bdb369e open 3021[telefon eliminat] exg-crim-part NO0A3 929911709 fc1aa349-7609-4699-ba9c-1440ea06025e-01 cn-standard 50 ORG-0001 ORG-[telefon eliminat]:00:00+00:00 exg-crim-traffick 70 33 47 00 exg-sitn-bankr Keiser Wilhelms gate 11 Ålesund exg-crim-terror NOK epo-notice no-eu-funds NOR exg-pmt-bre-tax 10:00:58+00:00 https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/sunnmore-tingrett/ 30237000 true ENG no fd2e89fa-9026-4bcc-9604-d0bd380c14d6 08:29:17+00:00 fa-wo-rc 08:40:58+00:00 exg-mis-misrepresent 30200000 LOT-0000 exg-sitn-liq-admin update-add exg-mis-misconduct 10:01:00+00:00 exg-mis-bre-env-law epo-procurement-document exg-pmt-bre-ssc false exg-crim-laund exg-sitn-cred-arran 25/17230 https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=95538 exg-crim-corrpt Innkjøp 30214[telefon eliminat]+00:00