Norvegia – Lucrări de construcţii – Procurement of a turnkey contract Hovseter - new special department

Procurement of a turnkey contract Hovseter - new special department N/A Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, have been legally convicted of offences regarding professional behaviour in defence procurements? Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Artifik AS Is the tenderer assessed to lack the reliability necessary to exclude the risk of national security? Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? The offered personnel ́ competence and experience Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42). Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). Oslobygg KF has been given the task of establishing a new special department at Hovseter school for pupils with diagnoses within autism spectrum disorders. The total gross area (gross area) is 1,234 m² distributed over two floors as well as a technical roof room. The building shall be constructed from solid wood, with visible wooden surfaces and external aluminium covers and it shall fulfil the requirements for plus house standards. The building shall have robust and adapted systems that meet the target group`s needs. A separate outside area shall be established that shall be integrated in the existing outdoor installations. See the tender documentation Part II - The contract documentation and accompanying annexes for further information on the assignment. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? In this procurement, the environment is not weighted as an award criteria by 30%. The contracting authority has chosen to have strict minimum requirements for the environment that, according to the contracting authority ́s assessment, will give a better environmental effect than setting the environment as an award criteria. Pursuant to the Public Procurement Act § 5b, second paragraph, the fourth period, the Contracting Authority is obliged to provide a justification for this in the procurement documents. In this procurement, emission free construction sites and all machines that are used at the construction site shall be emission free from the start of construction until completion. The transport shall be carried out by using vehicles with zero emission or biogas technology. Furthermore, there are requirements to map and prioritise the reuse of at least five different types of components in the project, and as many components as possible shall be disassembled and reused during future demolition or alterations to the building. The building shall be constructed as a solid wood plus house and solar panels and well parks shall be established. Climate gas accounts shall be prepared in accordance with NS3720, and a separate requirement is made as to the maximum climate gas emissions from materials thereof. In the competition tenderers shall price an option on extreme low carbon concrete. The contract also states that waste from the construction site shall be source sorted and a minimum of 90 percent of the waste shall be sorted and delivered to a certified waste disposal site or directly for recycling.    The contracting authority has also chosen to award fulfilment of some environmental aspects in the contract period with a bonus. This applies to emission-free transport, and is being done in order to achieve further reductions of the environmental and climate impact within what has been identified and assessed as suitable themes. By setting such minimum requirements, it is ensured better climate and environmental effect than by setting up the award criteria(s) associated with the environment. The exclusionary provision in the Public Procurement Act § 5b, second paragraph, third period will therefore apply.  Oslo tingrett Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Price Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. One month. Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Oslo kommune v/ Oslobygg KF Assignment comprehension Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. 01 exg-mis-sanction none exg-mis-prep-confl required 0125 exg-mis-distortion exg-sitn-other price gen-pub 10 9751 exg-sitn-as-susp 16 Stortingsgata 12 quality 32014L0024 0 per-exa 1 exg-mis-bre-soc-law 3 ba7798ba-3b9b-4795-9037-47cc085e0557 73f77494-d6df-472c-ab30-3648513c7a91 https://app.artifik.no/procurements/7432 exg-crim-fraud Postboks 2106 Vika 20 [email eliminat] body-pl Åsne Tinnes-Rimehaug works Postboks 6391 Etterstad eforms-sdk-1.13 12:47:12.643Z exg-sitn-insolvency https://www.oslo.kommune.no/etater-foretak-og-ombud/oslobygg-kf/ https://artifik.no exg-mis-partic-confl 0161 [telefon eliminat] exg-mis-bre-lab-law 2.3 open exg-crim-part exg-mis-unrel-sec 2028-10-18Z 924599545 [telefon eliminat] ORG-0003 cn-standard 0604 10:00:00.000Z ORG-[telefon eliminat] ORG-0002 Oslo exg-natl-bre-nat-law exg-crim-traffick 2026-08-14Z NO081 exg-sitn-bankr [email eliminat] exg-crim-terror epo-notice no-eu-funds NOR exg-pmt-bre-tax 157/2026 restricted-document https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/oslo-tingrett/ true exg-mis-off-cond ENG no e-Tendering 45000000 not-allowed exg-mis-misrepresent LOT-0001 exg-sitn-liq-admin exg-mis-misconduct 2026-11-17Z 70 2026-08-17+02:00 exg-mis-bre-env-law epo-procurement-document 925364967 serv-prov 7432 [email eliminat] exg-pmt-bre-ssc false exg-sitn-cred-arran exg-crim-laund 2026-10-09Z performance [telefon eliminat] exg-crim-corrpt