Norvegia – Echipament de iluminat stradal – Framework agreement - Road and street lighting

N/A Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Framework agreement - Road and street lighting See ITT, point 4 Qualification Requirements, etc. Documentation requirements: See ITT, point 4 Qualification Requirements, etc. Climate and environment Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, have been legally convicted of offences regarding professional behaviour in defence procurements? Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Reduction of environmental impact Artifik AS Is the tenderer assessed to lack the reliability necessary to exclude the risk of national security? Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? The tenderer's registration, authorisation, etc. Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Quality Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons. Sør-Rogaland tingrett Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42). Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? The procurement is for a framework agreement for the delivery of road and street lights, as further described in Annex 1 - Requirements for Products and Deliveries. The framework agreement also includes the delivery of other lighting products (fittings, spare parts, components, control components etc.) that are included in the tenderer's standard assortment (other assortment) both within road lighting and street lighting, but also other fixtures and equipment. The framework agreement is a non-exclusive framework agreement that gives the Contracting Authority the right, but not an obligation, to make call-offs within the Contract Period. The contracting authority shall not be obliged to procure a specific amount within The agreement period. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Price Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. LYSE LUX AS Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? 1 + 1 year. The contract will be valid for 2 years, with an option for the contracting authority to extend the contract for a further 1 year + 1 year, to a total of maximum 4 years. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. 01 exg-mis-sanction 926723448 Stavanger [telefon eliminat] none exg-mis-prep-confl 13[telefon eliminat] required 110000000 exg-mis-distortion exg-sitn-other supplies price Eivind Sødal [telefon eliminat]:00:00.000Z faf487ef-d20a-4984-8524-02febe5b49a6 gen-pub 10 exg-sitn-as-susp 16 Stortingsgata 12 31527200 quality 32014L0024 per-exa 1 2 exg-mis-bre-soc-law Breiflåtveien 18 2026-09-25Z exg-crim-fraud slc-suit-reg-trade 34928500 eforms-sdk-1.13 exg-sitn-insolvency [telefon eliminat] STAVANGER https://artifik.no 31600000 30 exg-mis-partic-confl 4001 [email eliminat] 0161 https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/sor-rogaland-tingrett/ exg-mis-bre-lab-law 2.3 open 45 14:06:38.071Z 48 2026-08-25Z exg-crim-part used Postboks 159 Sentrum exg-mis-unrel-sec ORG-0003 [email eliminat] cn-standard pub-undert ORG-0001 ORG-0002 Oslo exg-natl-bre-nat-law exg-crim-traffick NO081 exg-sitn-bankr [email eliminat] exg-crim-terror NOK epo-notice 7b6d787e-d1bb-4f6e-acd3-7a92c1618c73 no-eu-funds NO0A1 NOR exg-pmt-bre-tax restricted-document true 4017 exg-mis-off-cond 60 ENG no e-Tendering 165/2026 fa-wo-rc not-allowed exg-mis-misrepresent LOT-0001 https://www.lysekonsern.no/ exg-sitn-liq-admin exg-mis-misconduct 2026-08-27+02:00 https://app.artifik.no/procurements/4555 exg-mis-bre-env-law 925364967 31500000 serv-prov exg-pmt-bre-ssc false 31527260 923119159 exg-sitn-cred-arran exg-crim-laund 5926 performance env-imp 4555 exg-crim-corrpt