Norvegia – Servicii de lăcătuşărie – Procurement – Locks, hardware, and access control with associated goods and services, 2026 – Part 1 North (2)

Is the supplier known to have committed a breach of environmental obligations as set out in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents, or Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU? Is the supplier known to have committed a breach of provisions regarding social conditions as set out in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents, or Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU? The following grounds for rejection set out in Section 24-2 of the Public Procurement Regulations are purely national grounds for rejection: – Section 24-2(2). This provision stipulates that the contracting authority shall reject a supplier when it is aware that the supplier has been convicted by a final judgment or has accepted a fine for the specified criminal offenses. The requirement for the contracting authority to reject suppliers who have accepted a fine for the specified criminal offenses is a specifically Norwegian requirement. – Section 24-2(3), letter (i). The ground for rejection in the ESPD form applies only to serious professional misconduct, whereas the Norwegian ground for rejection also encompasses other serious misconduct that may cast doubt on the supplier’s professional integrity. Payment of taxes, VAT, and other public levies: This requirement applies only to Norwegian suppliers. Requirement: The supplier must be in good standing regarding the payment of taxes, employer's national insurance contributions, and value-added tax (VAT) in accordance with statutory provisions, and must not have significant outstanding arrears. Any arrears or other irregularities must be justifiable. Documentation requirement: The supplier must document compliance with this requirement by providing the "Information on tax and VAT" certificate. The certificate must be of type "RF-1507" and not "RF-1316". The supplier orders this certificate from the Norwegian Tax Administration on behalf of their business. The tax certificate must not be older than five months, calculated from the deadline for submitting tenders. Is the supplier known to have committed a breach of obligations regarding working conditions as set out in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents, or Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU? State why it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract under the aforementioned circumstances, taking into account applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. This information need not be provided if the exclusion of suppliers in such a situation is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of an exception, even where the supplier is nevertheless able to perform the contract. renewal length is 12 months Credit assessment: Requirement: The supplier must possess the financial capacity to perform the contract. The supplier is required to be creditworthy—with a minimum rating of A according to Dun & Bradstreet’s RiskGuardian Suite (RGS)—or otherwise demonstrate the financial capacity to perform the contract at the contracting authority’s discretion. Documentation requirements: The contracting authority will itself assess the supplier’s financial status using RGS. The supplier may submit other relevant information if it believes that RGS does not accurately reflect its financial situation—for instance, in the event of a credit rating lower than the required level. This may take the form of an explanation as to how the supplier nevertheless meets the requirement, supported by relevant documentation (e.g., financial statements, annual reports, etc.). Solution description Experience: Requirement: The supplier, or the supplier's employees, must have experience from at least 3 (three) assignments within the last 3 (three) years that are relevant to this contract. At least one of the assignments must involve goods and services related to locks and hardware, with a value of at least NOK 100,000 (excl. VAT). At least one of the assignments must involve goods and services related to the ARX access control system, with a value of at least NOK 150,000 (excl. VAT). At least one of the assignments must involve goods and services related to the iLOQ access control system, with a value of at least NOK 50,000 (excl. VAT). Documentation requirement: Completed attachment "Supplier's experience," or another document containing equivalent information (max. 2 A4 pages). For the cost calculation, the supplier must complete the attached price schedule and submit it as an attachment to the tender in Excel format. The total sum for evaluation derived from the price schedule forms the basis for the price evaluation. A hybrid model with a single breakpoint is used for the price assessment. A template for the evaluation model is attached. Please refer to the tender documentation for further details. Ålesund Kommune Has the supplier itself, or a person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body—or who has the authority to represent, control, or make decisions within such bodies—been convicted by a final judgment of money laundering or terrorist financing within the last five years, or is there an exclusion period specified directly in the judgment that remains in effect? Has the supplier itself, or a person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body or has the power to represent, control, or make decisions within such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment—handed down no more than five years ago—of participation in a criminal organization, or is there an exclusion period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Participation in a criminal organization as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42). Has the supplier itself, or a person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body or has the power to represent, control, or make decisions within such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of corruption—either in a judgment delivered no more than five years ago or where an exclusion period specified directly in the judgment is still applicable? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union (OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1) and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This ground for exclusion also covers corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority or the supplier. Has the supplier itself, or a person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body or has the power to represent, control, or make decisions within such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment—handed down no more than five years ago, or where an exclusion period specified directly in the judgment is still in effect—of terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities? Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities are defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This ground for exclusion also covers incitement to, aiding or abetting, or attempting to commit such offences, as referred to in Article 4 of the said Framework Decision. Participants in the agreement: Communes: -Ålesund -Giske -Sula -Sykkylven -Fjord -Haram Other: -Ålesund kommune administrasjonsbygg AS Is the supplier in a situation of bankruptcy? Please state why, under the aforementioned circumstances, the supplier is nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the exclusion of suppliers in such a situation is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of an exception, even where the supplier is able to perform the contract. Is the supplier aware of a conflict of interest as specified in national law, the relevant notice, or the procurement documents? Has the supplier, or an entity affiliated with the supplier, provided advice to the contracting authority or otherwise been involved in the planning of the procurement process? Has the supplier committed serious professional misconduct? Where relevant, refer to definitions in national law, the relevant notice, or the procurement documents. Is the supplier in a similar situation under a corresponding procedure established in national law? Refer to national law, the relevant notice, or the procurement documents. The supplier is requested to attach a solution description outlining how the supplier—both generally throughout the contract period and for individual assignments—will ensure: - high priority, good availability, and access to relevant expertise, including the capacity to handle concurrent assignments - effective follow-up, communication, and collaboration with the individual customer and the client’s contract manager - high quality and effective execution, including planning, progress management, and quality assurance - effective deviation management, including identification, reporting, follow-up, closure, and learning from deviations - continuous development and improvement of the delivery based on experience and feedback. The client will evaluate the extent to which the described solution demonstrates an understanding of the customer's needs and appears concrete, feasible, and capable of ensuring high quality, effective collaboration, and efficient execution of deliveries throughout the contract period. The response must not exceed two A4 pages. This award criterion will be assessed based on the supplier's response to the criterion. The evaluation will involve an overall professional assessment of the described solution. The best solution will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded scores proportionally relative to the best solution. Please refer to the tender documentation for further details. Has the supplier entered into agreement(s) with other suppliers with the intention of distorting competition? Has the supplier's business operations been halted? Has the supplier committed a material breach of contract in connection with the performance of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority, or a previous concession contract, where the breach led to termination of the contract, damages, or other similar sanctions? The supplier receives credit for using zero-emission vehicles and/or biogas vehicles meeting Euro 6/VI standards during the contract period. In addition, some credit is awarded for hybrid technology. Please refer to the attached Excel vehicle form for detailed information regarding the award criterion and the evaluation method. Suppliers are requested to include the completed vehicle form with their tender. This award criterion is assessed based on the supplier's responses in the aforementioned form. NB! Failure to complete the form, or incomplete or incorrect completion, may result in a point deduction or a score of zero. The best solution is awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions are awarded scores in accordance with the evaluation model described in the form. Please refer to the tender documentation for further details. -high priority, good availability, and access to relevant expertise, including the capacity to handle concurrent assignments Is the supplier in a situation of insolvency? Please state why, under the aforementioned circumstances, it is nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the exclusion of suppliers in such a situation is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of an exception, even when the supplier is able to perform the contract. Has the supplier itself, or a person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body—or who has the authority to represent, control, or make decisions within such bodies—been convicted of fraud by a final judgment handed down no more than five years ago, or is an exclusion period specified directly in the judgment still in effect? Has the supplier itself, or a person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body or has the power to represent, control, or make decisions within such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment—handed down no more than five years ago—of child labour or other forms of trafficking in human beings, or is an exclusion period set directly in the judgment still in effect? Child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1). Has the supplier failed to fulfill all its obligations regarding the payment of taxes and charges, both in the country where it is established and in the contracting authority's Member State, if this is a country other than the one where it is established? Service agreement Has the supplier: a) provided grossly incorrect information when supplying the information required to verify the absence of grounds for exclusion or compliance with qualification requirements, b) failed to provide such information, c) withheld the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) unduly influenced the contracting authority’s decision-making process to obtain confidential information that could confer an unfair advantage in the competition, or negligently provided misleading information that could materially influence decisions regarding exclusion, selection, or award? Has the supplier failed to fulfill all its obligations to pay social security contributions both in the country where it is established and in the client's Member State, if this is a country other than the one where it is established? Is the supplier subject to a compulsory debt settlement arrangement? Please state why, under the aforementioned circumstances, the supplier is nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. This information need not be provided if the exclusion of suppliers in such a situation is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of an exception, even where the supplier is able to perform the contract. Price The purpose of the agreement is to meet the Client’s needs for locks, hardware, and access control—along with related products and services—in accordance with the requirements specification. The Supplier must be capable of supplying, installing, and maintaining most types of locks and hardware, as well as producing and supplying keys and similar items. The Supplier must also be able to supply, install, and maintain products and services related to locking and access control systems (e.g., iLOQ and ARX, including licenses), as well as automatic door operators, door closers, and door pumps. The Client possesses a large and diverse building portfolio and therefore requires a wide range of such products and services. Assignments under this agreement will primarily consist of the supply and installation of door locks and hardware, the implementation and installation of locking and access control systems, service assignments, and advisory services. The Supplier must be capable of handling both planned/routine assignments and urgent assignments (critical or non-critical) requiring short response times. Environment Procurement – Locks, hardware, and access control with associated goods and services, 2026 – Part 1 North (2) Sunnmøre tingrett 01 89 exg-mis-sanction allowed none exg-mis-prep-confl 26/15963 required exg-mis-distortion 44521110 exg-sitn-other supplies price Lenke til innkjøpsdokumentene gen-pub 6001 6003 exg-sitn-as-susp 16 [telefon eliminat] quality 32014L0024 per-exa fa-mix 2 exg-mis-bre-soc-law 3 44500000 11:05:00+00:00 ••• ••• 02+00:00 Jonette Valaas Skare exg-crim-fraud non-restricted-document 20 25 eforms-sdk-1.14 body-pl-la exg-sitn-insolvency slc-abil-ref-work Postboks 1354 Sentrum 44520000 07:50:05+00:00 ••• ••• 26+00:00 exg-mis-partic-confl [telefon eliminat] https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=100899 [email eliminat] services 44523000 exg-mis-bre-lab-law 44521100 2026-10-05+02:00 2.3 open 935365201 exg-crim-part NO0A3 929911709 cn-standard ORG-0001 ORG-0002 55 exg-natl-bre-nat-law 23:00:00+00:00 exg-crim-traffick 70 33 47 00 exg-sitn-bankr Keiser Wilhelms gate 11 Ålesund exg-crim-terror epo-notice no-eu-funds NOR exg-pmt-bre-tax 42961100 https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/sunnmore-tingrett/ 07:49:24+00:00 11:00:58+00:00 true https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=100899&GoTo=Tender 192/2026 ENG no [email eliminat] exg-mis-misrepresent 8a2f5018-8edb-4d20-a784-36adaaef6673 LOT-0000 exg-sitn-liq-admin exg-mis-misconduct exg-mis-bre-env-law 98395000 exg-pmt-bre-ssc false 6fb3ee57-be23-406c-9edb-8adf5b0c5143 exg-crim-laund exg-sitn-cred-arran 2026-11-20Z 2026-11-04+00:00 slc-stand-other 44523200 exg-crim-corrpt Innkjøp