Norvegia – Servicii de cercetare – Operationalisation and measurement of the police ́s commitment to the stand-by area.

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? Ten days after the waiting period. Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). The aim of the assignment is to develop a research based framework for operationalisation and measuring the police ́s commitment to work within police stand-by. The framework shall identify and describe central dimensions by their commitment ability, as well as develop indicators that can be used to measure these in a systematic manner. Furthermore, the assignment shall identify relevant variables and data sources that can provide a basis for measuring the commitment ability and assess their suitability as regards reliability, validity, data quality and practical applicability. The research assignment shall contribute to a common and knowledge based understanding of what characterises the police ́s ability to focus on stand-by and how this can be measured and followed over time. The aim is to establish a professional basis that can be used for management, management, analysis, evaluation, prioritising and further development of the police ́s stand-by at local tactical level. Furthermore, it is a goal that the research shall contribute to increased knowledge on what factors affect the commitment ability, and make recommendations on how the commitment can be measured in a way that is both professionally robust and practically relevant for the police. Oslo tingrett Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. Operationalisation and measurement of the police ́s commitment to the stand-by area. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. The contracting authority is in Oslo. Parts of the assignment can be executed elsewhere. Politiets fellestjenester 206/2026 26/201513 01 exg-mis-sanction 2026-10-23+02:00 pub-os exg-crim-part 926 725 939 none Anskaffelsesdokumenter exg-mis-prep-confl required 03 ••• ••• 11:44:14+00:00 exg-mis-distortion Fridtjof Nansens vei 14 exg-sitn-other [email eliminat] 2026-10-21+00:00 cn-standard ORG-0001 ORG-0002 11:00:00+00:00 exg-crim-traffick exg-sitn-as-susp 16 NO081 exg-sitn-bankr 2000000 exg-crim-terror NOK 13:00:51+00:00 epo-notice no-eu-funds NOR 32014L0024 exg-pmt-bre-tax 1 exg-mis-bre-soc-law 3 true epo-acc-espd-request 73300000 exg-crim-fraud 974761157 Astrid Røer Bjerke Postboks 2106 Vika 73000000 non-restricted-document ENG [email eliminat] no OSLO 73210000 [telefon eliminat] https://www.domstol.no/ eforms-sdk-1.14 2026-12-01+00:00 exg-sitn-insolvency not-allowed e0daeaa6-aaec-4ae8-b63e-771a4b2488e0 exg-mis-misrepresent 73200000 LOT-0000 https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=462332&TID=200422636&B= exg-sitn-liq-admin exg-mis-misconduct 7311[telefon eliminat]Z exg-mis-bre-env-law epo-procurement-document exg-mis-partic-confl [telefon eliminat] d17284d0-9124-41d1-bd3e-f767f5901976 https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/company/companyinformation/index/289530 exg-pmt-bre-ssc false services 734[telefon eliminat] [telefon eliminat] exg-crim-laund exg-sitn-cred-arran http://www.politiet.no exg-mis-bre-lab-law 2.3 exg-crim-corrpt cga open