Norvegia – Echipament şi accesorii pentru computer – Framework agreement IT-equipment

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Skaun kommune Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? Midtre Gauldal kommune Nærøysund kommune Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons. Will the purely national rejection reasons, as stated in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents, apply? The procurement follows the regulations and law. See Mercell and the tender documentation. Framework agreement IT-equipment Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. Leka kommune Orkland kommune Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). Trøndelag Tingrett Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. The framework agreement shall contribute to good delivery security, flexibility in assortment and appropriate price mechanisms, so that the Contracting Authority can make needs controlled and cost efficient procurements throughout the contract period, even in the case of changes in product life cycles, supplier portfolios and market situations. Furthermore, the agreement shall support the municipalities ́need for safe, stable and sustainable operations, including standardised procurements, hybrid work form, efficient life cycle management and proper disposal of ICT equipment. This procurement will be carried out as a joint tender work between several municipalities. The cooperation only includes implementation of the procurement process, including preparation of the tender documentation and evaluation of tender offers. The contracting authorities for this procurement are: ITMidt (inter-municipal IT and digitalisation cooperation between Melhus, Midtre Gauldal and Skaun) Leka municipalityNærøysund municipalityOrkland municipality The aim of the procurement is to establish a predictable and cost efficient framework agreement that covers the contracting authority ́s ongoing need for modern, reliable and functional ICT equipment. The agreement shall facilitate efficient and flexible management of procurements in a market characterised by rapid changes in technology, price and availability. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Tender documentation Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Melhus Kommune [email eliminat] 01 ••• ••• 10+00:00 exg-mis-sanction allowed https://permalink.mercell.com/283698002.aspx none exg-mis-prep-confl required exg-mis-distortion exg-sitn-other supplies 944 484 574 30213100 Orkanger gen-pub 30231310 [email eliminat] exg-sitn-as-susp 16 http://www.melhus.kommune.no 10:00:00+00:00 [telefon eliminat] [email eliminat] Rådhusvegen 2 32014L[telefon eliminat] exg-mis-bre-soc-law 3 2026-08-11+02:00 ••• ••• 00 exg-crim-fraud 921 785 410 non-restricted-document 30231300 [email eliminat] 7224 eforms-sdk-1.13 exg-sitn-insolvency 72867200 epo-sub-espd 155[telefon eliminat]:49:58+00:00 30213[telefon eliminat] exg-mis-partic-confl PROCEDURE 7353 301[telefon eliminat] [email eliminat] exg-mis-bre-lab-law 2.3 970 187 715 b27b15ea-442b-44cf-a883-349470bb15ce-01 ••• ••• 08-31Z open 2026-07-31+00:00 ••• ••• 94 ORG-0007 7004 Rørvik exg-crim-part Leka [telefon eliminat]/718 ORG-0003 ORG-0004 ORG-[telefon eliminat]+00:00 ORG-0006 cn-standard pub-undert Trondheim ORG-0001 Børsa ORG-[telefon eliminat] exg-natl-bre-nat-law exg-crim-traffick exg-sitn-bankr exg-crim-terror NOK André van Wijk Kjelstad epo-notice no-eu-funds NOR exg-pmt-bre-tax [email eliminat] true ENG 2030-08-31Z 921233418 74387000 no 7301 Anskaffelsesforskriften 283698002 fa-wo-rc not-allowed exg-mis-misrepresent 302[telefon eliminat] LOT-0000 c0b0812d-cd62-41e8-9b3f-3b63be77fc72 Støren 9a00dd8b-621e-4e04-acd0-26b87ec5be83 exg-sitn-liq-admin update-add exg-mis-misconduct exg-mis-bre-env-law epo-procurement-document 72467300 72403000 NO060 MELHUS false exg-pmt-bre-ssc 08:03:43+00:00 exg-crim-laund exg-sitn-cred-arran slc-stand-other 153/2026 exg-crim-corrpt