Danemarca – Servicii de inspecţie a conductelor – IA_IRM ROV_26-34_FA

Klagenævnet for Udbud, Nævnenes Hus Information about the Applicant’s experience. The Applicant is encouraged to provide the following information with the object of the Con-tract in Annex I (Response form) and/or part V of the eESPD about the Applicant’s completed experience with the type of work as specified in section 2.4 and further provide information about technical experience with subjects as per below bullet list. Offshore IRM scope of services in the North Sea: Project Management and engineering, CSWIP Inspectors and coordinators, WROW, OROV and Mini ROV operations from DP operated vessel, Operation and management of DP2 vessels, Vessel inspection/auditing in compliance with OCIMF OVID. The Applicant is encouraged to submit a maximum of 3 references regarding experience with the object of the Contract. If more references are submitted, only the most recent references up to the maximum number of references will be considered. No additional documentation for the selection criterion for experience will be required from the Applicant. However, the Contracting Entity reserves the right to contact the Applicant or relevant third parties for verification of the information stated in the description(s). Assessment of experience. The Applicant’s experience will be based on the information submitted and will be an overall assessment of: (a) Similarity to the Contract, including the following elements: The more recent the references for IRM ROV scope of works in the North Sea are, the more positive the references will be considered. (b) In addition to this, it will be considered as favourable if references are within the offshore oil and gas industry. The Applicant is encouraged to provide information for each reference: Project name, Project location, Name of customer, Time of execution and duration of field work, A short concise description of the deliveries including description of Applicants’ role and responsibility. The services are to be provided in the danish part of the north sea. Ørsted salg og service A/S Contractual terms: Risk exposure as described further in the tender documents. Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen See the framework agreement Udelukkelsesgrundene finder ikke anvendelse IA_IRM ROV_26-34_FA The services are to be provided in the danish part of the north sea. Please be aware that start date is only an estimate and may change. The Contracting Entity has made the following estimates for all the entities who can purchase under the Framework Agreement: Estimated value 60.000.000 DKK. The above estimates are indicative, and the aggregated purchases made under the Framework Agreement may vary from the above estimates. Unforeseen circumstances might occur if for in-stance new projects, strategic changes or new needs arise. Therefore, the Contracting Entity has decided to also include the following maximums: Maximum value 90.000.000 DKK. The above estimates and maximums do not preclude or change the Contracting Entity’s possibilities to make modifications to the Contract, cf. article 89 of the Utilities Directive. The deadline for filing a complaint in Denmark is governed by the Act on the Procurement Complaints Board (lov om Klagenævnet for Udbud). In a procurement with prequalification under the Utilities Directive, a complaint about not having been prequalified must be filed within 20 calendar days. This is calculated from the day after the contracting authority's dispatch of the notification of prequalification. The complainant must notify the contracting authority of the submission of a complaint no later than at the same time as the complaint is submitted to the Procurement Complaints Board (Klagenævnet for Udbud). Publications Office of the European Union Ørsted are planning for a new frame agreement with bi-annual ROV inspection with planned call-offs in 2027-2029-2031 optional 2033, but not limited to call-off in these specific years. The ROV IRM scope will be at the two Ørsted owned and operated 24” and 30” offshore gas pipelines including subsea structures, risers and spools and the 20” offshore oil pipeline. 2.3.5 Inspection services. Contractor shall perform inspections including but not limited to: IRM ROV inspection work according to Ørsted, inspections Sheets, Visual Inspection, CP stabbing, Cleaning of Marine Growth. And optional but not limited to scope for: Removal of seabed objects, Flooded member detection (FMD), FIGS pipeline and structure CP task, Other ROV task. Please note, that above scope is preliminary and a subject of change. The scope / tasks are not limited to above. The final scope will be defined in each call-off. Contractor shall perform the work in accordance with the procedures, specifications and re-quirements set out in Ørsted but not limited to this. In undertaking this work Contractor shall engineer his activities in such a way, that it will include all and any on- and offshore work required to perform the scope of work. Expected duration for execution including mobilization and demobilization per call-off is 5 – 10 days. Vessel and equipment: Vessel that can operate safely in the North Sea area, Operation and management of DP2 ROV support vessels, Vessel that can be approved an operated after Marine Operation Procedures (TotalEnergies, INEOS, and Ørsted), ROVS onboard: WROV, OROV and Mini ROV, High pressure subsea cleaning equipment. Technical Solution: Vessel specification and capabilities, Methodology and Resources and Data Management as described further in the tender documents. Jo ­ Forlængelse af rammeaftalens varighed med 12 måneder 2 gange The most economically advantageous Tender will be identified on the basis of the award criterion best price-quality ratio as described further in the tender documents. Please be aware that start date is only an estimate and may change. The Contracting Entity has made the following estimates for all the entities who can purchase under the Framework Agreement: Estimated value 60.000.000 DKK. The above estimates are indicative, and the aggregated purchases made under the Framework Agreement may vary from the above estimates. Unforeseen circumstances might occur if for in-stance new projects, strategic changes or new needs arise. Therefore, the Contracting Entity has decided to also include the following maximums: Maximum value 90.000.000 DKK. The above estimates and maximums do not preclude or change the Contracting Entity’s possibilities to make modifications to the Contract, cf. article 89 of the Utilities Directive. If the Applicant has not provided all or any of the economically figures or the opening balance , the Applicant will not be scored for selection criterion “Economic and Financial capacity”, unless the Contracting Entity choose to allow supplementation on the Application. The same applies if an Applicant relies on a Supporting Entity and the Applicant has not provided information about all the key figures for the Supporting Entity or has not submitted the opening balance for the Supporting Entity and the Applicant has also not provided information about all its own key figures. If an Applicant relies on a Supporting Entity and has not provided information about all the key figures for the Supporting Entity or the opening balance for the Supporting Entity , but the Applicant has provided in-formation about all its own key figures , then the economic and financial capacity will be assessed based on the Applicant’s key figures, unless the Contracting Entity chooses to allow supplementation of the Application . Likewise, if an Applicant has provided all the key figures for the Supporting Entity, but not the Applicant’s key figures, the evaluation will be based on the Supporting Entity’s key figures. Applicants and Supporting Entities will be scored if they submit all the requested key figures in the available audited annual report. If a Consortium has provided all the key figures for one of the Consortium members, but not for all Consortium members, the evaluation will be based on the key figures for the Consortium member that submitted all key figures, unless the Contracting Entity chooses to allow supple-mentation of the Application. Health, Safety and Environment: QHSE Plan, E-targets and relevant E-initiatives and QHS targets and relevant QHS Initiatives as described further in the tender documents. The Applicant is encouraged to provide information about the following key figures in part V of the ESPD based on the latest two audited annual reports: Turnover (revenue), Earnings before tax (EBT), Current assets, Total assets (sum of all assets), Total shareholder’s equity (equity including minority shares), Current liabilities, Intangible assets, Inventories, Trade receivables, Cash and cash equivalents, Trade payables, Total interest-bearing debt (bank loans, draw on revolving credit facilities and corporate bonds). If the Applicant is a newly established legal entity and therefore is not able to submit the latest two audited annual reports the Applicant is encouraged to provide the opening balance. If the Applicant has only one audited annual report at the time of the Prequalification Deadline the Applicant is encouraged to provide this report and is encouraged to inform the Contracting Entity that the Applicant only has one audited annual report. A newly established legal entity is encouraged to consider relying on the economic and financial capacity of the parent company or any other supporting entity. If an Applicant relies on one or more Supporting Entities’ economic and financial capacities the evaluation will be based on the strongest entity’s key figures. It is to be made clear from part II C of the ESPD that the Applicant relies on the economic and financial information of the Supporting Entity by ticking “yes” in section II C of the ESPD: “Does the economic operator re-ly on the capacities of other entities…”. All Applicants are encouraged to submit both their own and the Supporting Entity’s key figures, unless the Applicant and the Supporting Entity have consolidated accounts. If the Applicant and the Supporting Entity have consolidated accounts, the evaluation will be based on the key figures in the latest two audited and consolidated annual reports. If the Supporting Entity does not have consolidated and audited annual reports with the Applicant, it is possible to submit both entities’ key figures based on the two latest audited annual reports together with a financial statement from the auditor of the companies providing the combined key figures for both entities (referred to as consolidated figures in the next sentence), but where intercompany transactions and balances (including loans) are eliminated. In this instance, the evaluation will be based on the consolidated figures in the financial statement from the auditor of the companies. If the Applicant is part of a profit sharing agreement with another legal entity, cf. for example Germany’s Ergebnisabführungsvertrag or equivalent legal arrangement or if the parent company of the Applicant has made a statement according to the Dutch Civil Code article 2:403 (a “403 statement”) or equivalent legal arrangement, the Applicant should declare in the ESPD part II C that it relies on another entity. Further the Supporting Entity shall fill out a separate ESPD. The Applicant or the Supporting Entity is encouraged to explicitly mention the profit sharing agreement/403 statement in the ESPD part V. In case of a profit sharing agreement the evaluation will be based on the figures for the financially strongest entity participating in the arrangement. Only this company is to insert financial figures in the ESPD part V. Consortia are encouraged to provide the key figures based on the latest two audited annual reports of all participating entities in the Consortium. If a Consortium relies on a Supporting Entity. If the key figures are sent for more entities (e.g. two participating entities in the Consortium), the evaluation will be based on the strongest entity’s audited annual reports. The Applicant is encouraged to submit a description of its ownership and corporate structure. If the Applicant is a subsidiary, the Applicant is encouraged to submit the name of the highest possible group parent – being an entity directly or indirectly controlling more than 50 % of the Applicant. The information may be provided in part V of the ESPD. The Contracting Entity re-serves the right to set a deadline for submission of the description of ownership structure after the deadline for request to participate. When the Applicant later is to document the information about the key figures, the Contracting Entity will accept submission of the latest two audited annual reports. It is not required that the Applicant submits copies of the audited annual reports with signatures, but the Contracting Entity reserves the right to request copies of the signed audited annual reports that are with signatures. Assessment of economic and financial capacity: The evaluation of the Applicant’s economic and financial capacity will be based upon the in-formation submitted and will be an assessment of the following three areas (in prioritized or-der), all for the latest audited annual report unless otherwise mentioned below: Capital structure, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Estimated yearly value of the framework agreement to equity, Solvency ratio, (equity / total assets), Change of Tangible Net Worth, (equity less intangible assets) (based on both audited annual reports) and Debt to equity* Debt to earnings*, b) Liquidity, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Current ratio (current assets / current liabilities), Average working capital turnover (Turnover (Revenue)/Average working capital) (working capital calculated as the sum of inventories, trade receivables and cash and cash equivalents, subtracting trade payables), (based on both audited annual reports)* Current ratio (the oldest of the two latest audited annual reports)* (c) Profitability. (The two criteria have equal priority): Earnings before tax to total assets, Earnings before tax margin (Earnings before tax (EBT) / Turnover (revenue) (based on both audited annual reports). DNK 01 www.orstedprocurement.com DK050 allowed 2026-12-15+01:00 [email eliminat] Toldboden 2 none 154/2026 [telefon eliminat] required Fredericia supplies price 8800 Viborg 15 3770e2bb-5ee2-4a42-9fed-edbed14f95c0 17 90000000 PUBL quality 32014L0025 per-exa 1 www.naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/ 2026-09-07+02:00 3 [telefon eliminat] epo-acc-espd-request 20 non-restricted-document 37795526 25 https://www.orstedprocurement.com/go/9725577601978C7838E6 63726620 eforms-sdk-1.14 DK032 max-pass [telefon eliminat] slc-abil-ref-work LU000 Kraftværksvej 53 https://op.europa.eu [email eliminat] All tender documents are available 35 not-requ [email eliminat] services [email eliminat] DAN 6[telefon eliminat]:43:46Z 13:00:00+02:00 ted-esen 7[telefon eliminat] https://www.orstedprocurement.com www.orsted.com neg-w-call 76600000 DK012 2500 Luxembourg ORG-0003 cn-standard anyw-cou ORG-0000 ORG-0001 ORG-[telefon eliminat]+02:00 DKK [telefon eliminat] epo-notice no-eu-funds true 2026-09-15+02:00 no fa-wo-rc not-allowed CrossBorderLaw LOT-0001 2b6d8489-6791-44e8-bed2-d440dc18a448 gas-heat 99558708 27210538 Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 false www.kfst.dk LUX Valby slc-stand-other performance 23:59:59+02:00 2026-08-11Z 80 2417